-
2nd Quarter, 2013 TOT Comments
-
by
Matthew Cimitile
—
published
Oct 04, 2013
—
last modified
Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM
—
filed under:
Aquatic,
Ecological Flows
Review of Quarterly Report by Technical Oversight Team
Located in
Research
/
…
/
Quarterly Reports
/
Q2 2013
-
Abstract and Progress Report for Q3 2012
-
by
Bridgett Costanzo
—
published
Nov 02, 2012
—
last modified
Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM
—
filed under:
Energy,
Aquatic,
Ecological Flows
Abstract and progress report from the Vendor for the Ecological Flows Project.
Located in
Research
/
…
/
Quarterly Reports
/
Q3 2012
-
Aquatic Classification Crosswalk
-
by
Andrew Milliken
—
published
Apr 21, 2014
—
last modified
Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM
—
filed under:
Aquatic,
Connecticut River Pilot
Crosswalk between UMass classification used for Ecological Integrity and TNC Classification developed for Northeast States
Located in
Projects
/
…
/
Aquatic Technical Subteam
/
Background/General Information
-
Aquatic Classification Crosswalk
-
by
Andrew Milliken
—
published
Apr 21, 2014
—
last modified
Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM
—
filed under:
Aquatic,
Connecticut River Pilot
Crosswalk between UMass classification used for Ecological Integrity and TNC Classification developed for Northeast States
Located in
Projects
/
…
/
Aquatic Technical Subteam
/
Aquatic Subteam Meeting 04-25-2014
-
Aquatic Ecological Flows Phase 1 Report
-
by
William Fisher, Jason Taylor, Maya Weltman-Fahs
—
published
Oct 07, 2013
—
last modified
Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM
—
filed under:
Models,
Report,
Aquatic,
Ecological Flows
The 1st phase of the Aquatic Ecological Flows project involved reviewing existing tools and gathering available data within the project area on hydrologic and ecological flow model(s) that would be suitable for the region. This Report details that work.
Located in
Research
/
…
/
Workspace
/
Deliverables
-
Aquatic Species Richness
-
by
Jessica Rhodes
—
published
Mar 11, 2016
—
last modified
Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM
—
filed under:
Aquatic,
Cave and Karst,
AppLCC Funded,
Map Products,
Caves,
Karst
Distribution of aquatic species richness by 20 kilometers grids throughout the Appalachian LCC region. At this scale, the hotspots of aquatic species richness are in southern Indiana (the Mitchell Plain) and central Kentucky (Mammoth Cave).
Located in
Projects
/
…
/
Gallery: Cave and Karst Maps
/
Study Overview Maps and Foundational Datasets
-
Aquatic Species Richness by County
-
by
Jessica Rhodes
—
published
Mar 11, 2016
—
last modified
Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM
—
filed under:
Aquatic,
Cave and Karst,
AppLCC Funded,
Map Products,
Caves,
Karst
Distribution of aquatic species at the county scale throughout the Appalachian LCC region.
Located in
Projects
/
…
/
Gallery: Cave and Karst Maps
/
Study Overview Maps and Foundational Datasets
-
Central Appalachian Climate Change Vulnerability Species Assessments
-
by
Web Editor
—
published
Oct 21, 2015
—
last modified
Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM
—
filed under:
Bat,
Aquatic,
Climate Adaptation,
Brook Trout,
NGO,
Climate,
GeoNode,
State,
Biological Assessment,
Caves,
Birds
These results are a compilation of climate change vulnerability assessments in the northern-most portion of the LCC, covering the area from New York south to West Virginia and Virginia, west to Pennsylvania and eastern Ohio.
Located in
Projects
/
…
/
Assessing Vulnerability of Species and Habitats to Large-scale Impacts
/
Vulnerability Assessment Foundational Data by Subregion
-
Central Appalachian subregion climate change vulnerability species assessments Excel Spreadsheet
-
by
Lesley Sneddon
—
published
Dec 18, 2015
—
last modified
Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM
—
filed under:
Bat,
Aquatic,
Brook Trout,
Climate Change,
NGO,
Climate,
GeoNode,
State,
Biological Assessment,
Caves,
Birds
These results are a compilation of climate change vulnerability assessments in the northern-most portion of the LCC, covering the area from New York south to West Virginia and Virginia, west to Pennsylvania and eastern Ohio. Results included are Byers and Norris 2011 (West Virginia); Furedi et al. 2011 (Pennsylvania), Ring et al. 2013 (New Jersey), Schlesinger et al. 2011 (New York); Virginia Division of Natural Heritage 2010 (Virginia). It also includes the results from species assessed as part of the current study (Sneddon et al. 2015).
Located in
Projects
/
…
/
Assessing Vulnerability of Species and Habitats to Large-scale Impacts
/
Vulnerability Assessment Foundational Data by Subregion
-
Cumberland - Southern Appalachian Climate Change Vulnerability Species Assessments
-
by
Web Editor
—
published
Oct 21, 2015
—
last modified
Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM
—
filed under:
West Virginia,
Climate,
Aquatic,
Climate Change,
Fish,
NGO,
Virginia,
Kentucky,
GeoNode,
Tennessee,
Mussels,
Alabama,
Caves,
Albedo
These results are a compilation of climate change vulnerability assessments in the southeastern portion of the LCC, covering the area from southern West Virginia, south to Alabama, west to eastern Kentucky and Tennessee. Hyperlinks to additional information are separated into two additional spreadsheets, one for aquatic and subterranean, and another for terrestrial species.
Located in
Projects
/
…
/
Assessing Vulnerability of Species and Habitats to Large-scale Impacts
/
Vulnerability Assessment Foundational Data by Subregion