Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
RETURN TO LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP SITE
return to main site

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections

Personal tools

You are here: Home
26 items matching your search terms.
Filter the results.
Item type

















New items since



Sort by relevance · date (newest first) · alphabetically
File text/texmacs 2nd Quarter, 2013 TOT Comments
by Matthew Cimitile published Oct 04, 2013 last modified Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM — filed under: ,
Review of Quarterly Report by Technical Oversight Team
Located in Research / / Quarterly Reports / Q2 2013
File Abstract and Progress Report for Q3 2012
by Bridgett Costanzo published Nov 02, 2012 last modified Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM — filed under: , ,
Abstract and progress report from the Vendor for the Ecological Flows Project.
Located in Research / / Quarterly Reports / Q3 2012
File Aquatic Classification Crosswalk
by Andrew Milliken published Apr 21, 2014 last modified Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM — filed under: ,
Crosswalk between UMass classification used for Ecological Integrity and TNC Classification developed for Northeast States
Located in Projects / / Aquatic Technical Subteam / Background/General Information
File Aquatic Classification Crosswalk
by Andrew Milliken published Apr 21, 2014 last modified Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM — filed under: ,
Crosswalk between UMass classification used for Ecological Integrity and TNC Classification developed for Northeast States
Located in Projects / / Aquatic Technical Subteam / Aquatic Subteam Meeting 04-25-2014
File Troff document Aquatic Ecological Flows Phase 1 Report
by William Fisher, Jason Taylor, Maya Weltman-Fahs published Oct 07, 2013 last modified Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM — filed under: , , ,
The 1st phase of the Aquatic Ecological Flows project involved reviewing existing tools and gathering available data within the project area on hydrologic and ecological flow model(s) that would be suitable for the region. This Report details that work.
Located in Research / / Workspace / Deliverables
Image Aquatic Species Richness
by Jessica Rhodes published Mar 11, 2016 last modified Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM — filed under: , , , , ,
Distribution of aquatic species richness by 20 kilometers grids throughout the Appalachian LCC region. At this scale, the hotspots of aquatic species richness are in southern Indiana (the Mitchell Plain) and central Kentucky (Mammoth Cave).
Located in Projects / / Gallery: Cave and Karst Maps / Study Overview Maps and Foundational Datasets
Image Aquatic Species Richness by County
by Jessica Rhodes published Mar 11, 2016 last modified Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM — filed under: , , , , ,
Distribution of aquatic species at the county scale throughout the Appalachian LCC region.
Located in Projects / / Gallery: Cave and Karst Maps / Study Overview Maps and Foundational Datasets
Central Appalachian Climate Change Vulnerability Species Assessments
by Web Editor published Oct 21, 2015 last modified Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM — filed under: , , , , , , , , , ,
These results are a compilation of climate change vulnerability assessments in the northern-most portion of the LCC, covering the area from New York south to West Virginia and Virginia, west to Pennsylvania and eastern Ohio.
Located in Projects / / Assessing Vulnerability of Species and Habitats to Large-scale Impacts / Vulnerability Assessment Foundational Data by Subregion
File text/texmacs Central Appalachian subregion climate change vulnerability species assessments Excel Spreadsheet
by Lesley Sneddon published Dec 18, 2015 last modified Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM — filed under: , , , , , , , , , ,
These results are a compilation of climate change vulnerability assessments in the northern-most portion of the LCC, covering the area from New York south to West Virginia and Virginia, west to Pennsylvania and eastern Ohio. Results included are Byers and Norris 2011 (West Virginia); Furedi et al. 2011 (Pennsylvania), Ring et al. 2013 (New Jersey), Schlesinger et al. 2011 (New York); Virginia Division of Natural Heritage 2010 (Virginia). It also includes the results from species assessed as part of the current study (Sneddon et al. 2015).
Located in Projects / / Assessing Vulnerability of Species and Habitats to Large-scale Impacts / Vulnerability Assessment Foundational Data by Subregion
Cumberland - Southern Appalachian Climate Change Vulnerability Species Assessments
by Web Editor published Oct 21, 2015 last modified Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM — filed under: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
These results are a compilation of climate change vulnerability assessments in the southeastern portion of the LCC, covering the area from southern West Virginia, south to Alabama, west to eastern Kentucky and Tennessee. Hyperlinks to additional information are separated into two additional spreadsheets, one for aquatic and subterranean, and another for terrestrial species.
Located in Projects / / Assessing Vulnerability of Species and Habitats to Large-scale Impacts / Vulnerability Assessment Foundational Data by Subregion