-
Project Scope of Work - Data Needs and GIS
-
by
Matthew Cimitile
—
published
Feb 18, 2014
We propose to review conservation planning tools, data needs, and integrative processes for the Appalachian LCC and provide packages of available data, as well as interpretive text. We will review ISC conservation planning goals and based on those, prioritize and justify gaps that need to be filled (e.g., through RFAs). We will apply conservation planning tools, using available data, to the AppLCC area and provide data products that result from those applications.
Located in
Research
/
…
/
Workspace
/
Research Project Background Information
-
2nd Quarter, 2013 Progress Report
-
by
Matthew Cimitile
—
published
Oct 04, 2013
—
last modified
Dec 04, 2013 06:59 PM
From vendor Clemson University for Data Needs Assessment Project.
Located in
Research
/
…
/
Quarterly Reports
/
Q2 2013
-
TOT Review of 2nd Quarter Report
-
by
Matthew Cimitile
—
published
Oct 04, 2013
Comments from Technical Oversight Team regarding 2nd Quarter Progress Report from Data Needs Assessment.
Located in
Research
/
…
/
Quarterly Reports
/
Q2 2013
-
Data Needs Assessment
-
by
Matthew Cimitile
—
published
Jan 28, 2013
—
last modified
Dec 22, 2015 10:47 AM
—
filed under:
Data Needs and GIS,
AppLCC Funded,
Our Work,
Research,
Deliverable,
Science and Research Products
The Data Needs Assessment research project was undertaken to review the variety of resources on conservation planning to provide packages of products, data, and identified data gaps to improve conservation planning in the Appalachian LCC. A suite of core conservation planning products and data from principal investigators at Clemson University are now available to the Cooperative.
Located in
Research
-
Ecosystem Services and Threats Assessment
-
by
Matthew Cimitile
—
published
Mar 11, 2013
—
last modified
Jul 15, 2014 12:34 PM
Knowing which ecosystem services are provided and who benefits from these services will allow resource managers, scientists, industries, and the public to explore new institutional, market, and policies to encourage protection of and investments in these resources. Objectives of this project are to 1) link the environmental and economic values of the region’s natural assets in a way that establishes a common language for resource managers, scientists, industry, local government and the public to substantively engage in landscape-level conservation planning and 2) to explore different development or management strategies and examine trade-offs to support improved and informed decision-making. A first step in determining the cumulative effects of stressors on Appalachian ecosystem integrity, functionality, and endemic or trust species, is having access to and appreciation of existing knowledge and data. A comprehensive status assessment will be conducted of pre-existing or ongoing work that could contribute to better understanding of individual or cumulative impacts, and further design of a landscape-scale assessment of environmental threats for the Appalachian LCC-defined landscape. The assessment will: (1) summarize existing threat assessment efforts of major stressors—including measures of ecosystems integrity, function, or sustainability, and identification of endemic species or trust species, (2) identify knowledge gaps and/or limitations to existing tools, methodology, and approaches, and (3) through a critical analysis and consultation based on expert-opinion, identify a framework and propose a process to facilitate the AppLCC systematically moving forward on a comprehensive threats assessment.
Located in
Research
/
Ecosystem Benefits and Environmental Threats
-
Ecosystem Services and Environmental Threats Scope of Work
-
by
Matthew Cimitile
—
published
Jul 15, 2014
The "Assessment and Inventory of Ecosystem Services and Environmental Threats" research project will deliver an inventory of existing ecosystem services assessments, products, and decision-support or visualization tools conducted within the Appalachian LCC boundary. The inventory will document and assess the classification, methodology used, describe priority ecosystem services and how they were identified, and provide economic valuations if available. Research will also involve a regional survey and workshops within our boundary to assemble a list of high priority economic goods and services and non‐monetized values and benefits that are dependent on Appalachia’s natural assets while identifying the associated resource that support these services and benefits (such as intact forests, clean rivers, etc.). Finally a geo‐referenced assessment of the location of key ecosystem services that are linked to specific priority economic products or uses will be developed. This will include assembling datasets and generating visualization-base maps that depict relevant natural assets and identify locations of key products and issues. This information would then be used to produce a spatial interpretation of areas within Appalachia that serve critical social and environmental functions, as well as identify those that are highly vulnerable to losses associated with key ecosystem stressors.
Located in
Research
/
Ecosystem Benefits and Environmental Threats
-
Assessing Future Energy Development Across the Appalachians
-
by
Matthew Cimitile
—
published
Nov 28, 2012
—
last modified
Nov 28, 2017 08:16 PM
—
filed under:
Models,
Energy,
AppLCC Funded,
Forests,
Our Work,
Science and Research Products,
Research,
Land Use
Assessing Future Energy Development across the Appalachian LCC used models that combined data on energy development trends and identified where these may intersect with important natural resource and ecosystem services to give a more comprehensive picture of what potential energy development could look like in the Appalachians. Ultimately this information is intended to support dialogue and conservation on how to effectively avoid, minimize, and offset impacts from energy development to important natural areas and the valuable services they provide.
Located in
Research
-
Progress Report for Quarter 2, 2013
-
by
Matthew Cimitile
—
published
Oct 04, 2013
—
filed under:
Energy
Report from Vendor The Nature Conservancy on progress for Energy Forecast Project.
Located in
Research
/
…
/
Quarterly Reports Folder
/
Q2 2013 Reporting Materials and Reviews
-
TOT Review of 2nd Quarter, 2013 Report
-
by
Matthew Cimitile
—
published
Oct 04, 2013
Comments from Technical Oversight Team regarding Energy Forecast Project.
Located in
Research
/
…
/
Quarterly Reports Folder
/
Q2 2013 Reporting Materials and Reviews
-
Summary of TOT Review for 4th Quarter, 2012 Report
-
by
Matthew Cimitile
—
published
Sep 30, 2013
—
last modified
Oct 04, 2013 01:16 PM
Comments from Technical Oversight Team for this report.
Located in
Research
/
…
/
Quarterly Reports Folder
/
Q4 2012 Reporting Materials and Reviews