-
Prescribed Fire Community of Practice
-
The Prescribed Fire Community of Practice (CoP) provides a clearinghouse for information on conducting controlled burns and the effects of fire on plants and wildlife. The CoP also offers information on fire through articles, FAQs from the nation’s top prescribed fire personnel, and up-to-date fire news and events. The CoP is a National Cooperative Extension Resource.
Located in
LP Members
/
Organizations Search
-
Prescribed Fire Councils
-
Prescribed Fire Councils (PFCs) allow private landowners, fire practitioners, agencies, non-governmental organizations, policymakers, regulators, and other stakeholders to network and share information related to prescribed fire; however, the purpose of each PFC differs based on their state’s needs.
Located in
Prescribed Burning
-
Prescribed Fire Councils Page
-
Located in
Prescribed Burning
-
Prescribed Fire Effects on Water Quality in the Southern Appalachians April 22nd, 12:00-1:00 EST
-
Kipling Klimas (Utah State University) will discuss his work assessing the impact of prescribed fire on high value forested watersheds in the southern Blue Ridge Mountains.
Located in
News & Events
/
Events Inbox
-
Prescribed Fire for Forest Management Webinar Series
-
Foresters and land managers have many management tools at their disposal. A tool that’s often overlooked is prescribed fire. Prescribed fire for forest management is important for ecosystem health, forest regeneration, wildlife habitat, forest health, and disease control. Join us for insightful discussions with national experts as we discuss forest management using prescribed fire. Learn some of the practical knowledge of where, when, why, and how to apply fire in forest ecosystems.
Located in
News & Events
/
Events Inbox
-
Presentation on Resources Available to the TRBN
-
Gillian Bee. Landscape Conservation Fellow. Clemson University/Appalachian LCC.
Located in
Resources
-
Private Landowner Network - National LCCs Map
-
Here is an interactive map of all National LCC's.
Located in
Cooperative
/
The Network
/
National LCC Network
-
Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation
-
For more than a decade, the target of keeping global warming below 2 6C has been a key focus of the international climate debate1. In response, the scientific community has published a number of scenario studies that estimate the costs of achieving such a target 2–5. Producing these estimates remains a challenge, particularly because of relatively well known, but poorly quantified, uncertainties, and owing to limited integration of scientific knowledge across disciplines6. The integrated assessment community, on the one hand, has extensively assessed the influence of technological and socio-economic uncertainties on low-carbon scenarios and asso- ciated costs2–4,7. The climate modelling community, on the other hand, has spent years improving its understanding of the geo- physical response of the Earth system to emissions of greenhouse gases8–12. This geophysical response remains a key uncertainty in the cost of mitigation scenarios but has been integrated with assess- ments of other uncertainties in only a rudimentary manner, that is, for equilibrium conditions6,13. Here we bridge this gap between the two research communities by generating distributions of the costs associated with limiting transient global temperature increase to below specific values, taking into account uncertainties in four factors: geophysical, technological, social and political. We find that political choices that delay mitigation have the largest effect on the cost–risk distribution, followed by geophysical uncertainties, social factors influencing future energy demand and, lastly, technological uncertainties surrounding the availability of greenhouse gas miti- gation options. Our information on temperature risk and mitigation costs provides crucial information for policy-making, because it clarifies the relative importance of mitigation costs, energy demand and the timing of global action in reducing the risk of exceeding a global temperature increase of 2 6C, or other limits such as 3 6C or 1.5 6C, across a wide range of scenarios.
Located in
Resources
/
Climate Science Documents
-
Professional development programs
-
Located in
Training
-
Profile Edit Tab
-
Edit tab for editing personal profile.
Located in
Help
/
Help Images