Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
RETURN TO LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP SITE
return to main site

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections

Personal tools

You are here: Home / Expertise Search / Costanzo, Bridgett Estel
52 items matching your search terms.
Filter the results.
Item type

















New items since



Sort by relevance · date (newest first) · alphabetically
File Abstract and Progress Report for Q3 2012
by Bridgett Costanzo published Nov 02, 2012 last modified Jun 02, 2025 01:11 PM — filed under: , ,
Abstract and progress report from the Vendor for the Ecological Flows Project.
Located in Research / / Quarterly Reports / Q3 2012
Project Troff document Assessment of Native Grasses for Forage & Bobwhite Habitat
by Bridgett Costanzo published Jun 11, 2019 last modified Apr 21, 2023 12:36 AM — filed under: , , , , ,
The University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, through its Center for Native Grasslands Management will conduct a study to evaluate the effectiveness of a working lands conservation model for enhancing northern bobwhite and other grasslands wildlife populations. Specifically, we will evaluate native grass forage production within fescue-belt landscapes to determine how effective this strategy is for improved survival and productivity of northern bobwhite and abundance of associated grassland bird species. The study will be conducted in cooperation with partner agencies within the fescue belt.
Located in Information / Research / WLFW Outcomes: Funded Research
File BBS Hotspots for Northern bobwhite
by Bridgett Costanzo published Mar 07, 2022 last modified Apr 21, 2023 12:03 AM — filed under: , , , , , , , ,
Hot spot map based on breeding bird survey data for northern bobwhite, as of 2011.
Located in Information / Maps and Spatial Data
File ECMAScript program Beef, Grass, and Bobwhites – Quail Management in Eastern Native Warm-Season Grass Pastures
by Bridgett Costanzo published Jul 20, 2021 last modified Nov 18, 2024 09:52 PM — filed under: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
This technical bulletin is targeted to technical advisors working with cattlemen and women in the eastern U. S. who are interested in managing for bobwhites. The authors combine a review of the literature, current research and first-hand experience to present this first-of-its-kind technical manual integrating grazing and bobwhite management in the eastern U. S. Published by NBTC and funded by WLFW.
Located in Information / Published Materials
by Bridgett Costanzo published Mar 17, 2021 last modified Jun 25, 2023 11:01 PM — filed under: , ,
Storyboard discusses similarities between habitat needs of the Eastern golden-winged warbler and Western sage grouse, both bird species with declining populations due to habitat loss in working landscapes - but benefiting from NRCS Working Lands for Wildlife intervention.
Located in Information Materials / Multimedia
File Bobwhite-specific Ranking Tool (GA example)
by Bridgett Costanzo published Mar 10, 2021 last modified Jun 28, 2023 05:55 PM — filed under: , , , , , , , , ,
This ranking tool was used in Georgia when they had a separate fund pool for a special bobwhite project.
Located in Information / NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials / Screening & Ranking
File Bog Turtle Wildlife Habitat Evaluation Guide (WHEG)
by Bridgett Costanzo published Dec 11, 2024 — filed under: , , , , , ,
WLFW uses WHEGs to evaluation before and after conditions anticipated from a contract.
Located in Information Materials / NRCS Conservation Practices and Materials
by Bridgett Costanzo published Feb 10, 2023
Abstract Forest management planning requires the specification of measurable objectives as desired future conditions at spatial extents ranging from stands to landscapes and temporal extents ranging from a single growing season to several centuries. Effective implementation of forest management requires understanding current conditions and constraints well enough to apply the appropriate silvicultural strategies to produce desired future conditions, often for multiple objectives, at varying spatial and temporal extents. We administered an online survey to forest managers in the eastern US to better understand how wildlife scientists could best provide information to help meet wildlife-related habitat objectives. We then examined more than 1000 review papers on bird–vegetation relationships in the eastern US compiled during a systematic review of the primary literature to see how well this evidence-base meets the information needs of forest managers. We identified two main areas where wildlife scientists could increase the relevance and applicability of their research. First, forest managers want descriptions of wildlife species–vegetation relationships using the operational metrics of forest management (forest type, tree species composition, basal area, tree density, stocking rates, etc.) summarized at the operational spatial units of forest management (stands, compartments, and forests). Second, forest managers want information about how to provide wildlife habitats for many different species with varied habitat needs across temporal extents related to the ecological processes of succession after harvest or natural disturbance (1–2 decades) or even longer periods of stand development. We provide examples of review papers that meet these information needs of forest managers and topic-specific bibliographies of additional review papers that may contain actionable information for foresters who wish to meet wildlife management objectives. We suggest that wildlife scientists become more familiar with the extensive grey literature on forest bird–vegetation relationships and forest management that is available in natural resource management agency reports. We also suggest that wildlife scientists could reconsider everything from the questions they ask, the metrics they report on, and the way they allocate samples in time and space, to provide more relevant and actionable information to forest managers. View Full-Text Keywords: forestry; silviculture; forest wildlife–habitat relationships; evidence-based practice; implementation gap; research relevance; synthesis; knowledge exchange; science–practice
Located in Information Materials / Research / WLFW Outcomes: Funded Research
Project Octet Stream Economic and Production Performance of Native Grasses as Forage in the Fescue Belt
by Bridgett Costanzo published Jun 11, 2019 last modified Apr 21, 2023 12:37 AM — filed under: , , , , ,
The primary purpose of developing this literature review and summary was to inform producers about the potential benefits from utilizing warm-season grasses in the Fescue Belt. Effectively, managing forages is not always straightforward for livestock producers. Summarizing the economic and production benefits from using warm-season grasses could help producers make more informed forage management decision and might encourage producers to consider adopting warm-season grasses. Furthermore, this literature review also gathered information about the potential benefits of using native grasslands as forage to the quail population in this region, which could likely result in an economic benefit to the producer from leasing farmland to hunters.
Located in Information / Research / WLFW Outcomes: Funded Research
File object code Field Borders-Wildlife (IL)
by Bridgett Costanzo published Mar 12, 2021 last modified Apr 21, 2023 12:13 AM — filed under: , , , , , , , , , ,
Job sheet
Located in Information / NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials / Job Sheets